Resume Skills
A skills section is a searchable list, which is why it works for tools, systems and certifications and fails for communication, leadership and attention to detail. The first group can be listed and believed; the second can only be shown.
These five pages cover what to put where, how to calibrate a claim honestly, and how to make a skill you have used somewhere else legible to a reader in a different field.
- 5
- Guides
- 3–5
- Groups, not one list
- 0
- Sign-up required
- Free
- No paywall
What goes where
The line between a skill you list and a skill you evidence.
Hard Skills and Soft Skills
Which belong in a skills list, and which must be evidenced instead.
Skills that cross contexts
Making experience from one field legible to a reader in another.
The rule that resolves most questions
If you can attach a number, a certificate or an artefact to it, list it. If you can only assert it, evidence it in a bullet instead.
That single test sorts almost everything. SQL, a nursing licence and a language have external verification available, so a list entry is a claim someone could check. Communication, judgement and reliability have none, so the word does no work and the example does all of it.
It also explains why the most common skills section — a comma-separated line mixing Excel with "team player" — reads as weak. Half of it is checkable and half is not, and mixing them makes a reader discount both.
Length, order and what a reader does with it
Three to five labelled groups of four to eight items each is the shape that gets read. A forty-item line matches everything and communicates nothing, because a reader cannot tell which four you actually use.
Order within each group by how central the item is to your work. Readers assume the first is the strongest and are usually right, which makes ordering a free way to communicate level without a rating.
And put the section where the role weights it: high on the page for technical work, below experience where the technical ability supports the job rather than being the job.
Frequently asked questions
Tools, systems, languages, certifications and field-specific techniques — anything with external verification available. Soft skills belong in bullets that evidence them rather than in a list.
Three to five labelled groups of four to eight items. A long comma-separated line matches everything and tells a reader nothing about which items you actually use.
No. They are unverifiable, mean different things to different readers, and invite the question of what four out of five means compared with whom. Split into "Proficient" and "Familiar", or attach usage to the entries that matter.
Strip the industry nouns out and describe the same work in the target field's vocabulary. "Reconciled the till against the POS report" is reconciliation and variance analysis, without inventing anything.